Anonymity and whistleblowing

Journal of Business Ethics 1 (3):167 - 177 (1982)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper examines the moral arguments for and against employees' blowing the whistle on illegal or immoral actions of their employers. It asks whether such professional dissidents are justified in disclosing wrongdoing by others while concealing their own identity. Part I examines the concept of anonymity, distinguishing it from two similar concepts — secrecy and privacy. Part II analyzes the concept of whistleblowing using recent definitions by Bok, Bowie and De George. Various arguments against anonymous whistleblowing are identified and evaluated. The author concludes with a defense of the practice in terms of social benefits — primarily the redressing of wrongdoing.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ELLAAW
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
553 ( #7,107 of 50,116 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #48,282 of 50,116 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.