Four Ways from Universal to Particular: How Chomsky's Language-Acquisition Faculty is Not Selectionist

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Following the development of the selectionist theory of the immune system, there was an attempt to characterize many biological mechanisms as being "selectionist" as juxtaposed to "instructionist." But this broad definition would group Darwinian evolution, the immune system, embryonic development, and Chomsky's language-acquisition mechanism as all being "selectionist." Yet Chomsky's mechanism (and embryonic development) are significantly different from the selectionist mechanisms of biological evolution or the immune system. Surprisingly, there is a very abstract way using two dual mathematical logics to make the distinction between genuinely selectionist mechanisms and what are better called "generative" mechanisms. This note outlines that distinction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-10-16
Latest version: 3 (2018-12-22)
View other versions
Added to PP

314 (#25,879)

6 months
38 (#21,971)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?