Maimonides and Spinoza on the Knowledge of Good and Evil: A Reappraisal of W.Z. Harvey

Iyyun 66 (3):258-269 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In an unsung yet excellent paper, W.Z. Harvey set out to explain how both Maimonides and Spinoza have similarly problematic views on the nature of the knowledge of good and evil. In it, he proposed an answer to solving the problem. In the many decades since, debates surrounding this topic have flourished. A recent paper by Joshua Parens, his conclusions mark a distinction between Spinoza and Maimonides that threaten to undermine Harvey’s solution to the problem. I will argue that, although Parens’ distinction forces us to revise Harvey’s contention, Harvey’s argument is still generally valid.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-21
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
126 ( #32,815 of 54,577 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
24 ( #28,868 of 54,577 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.