Maimonides and Spinoza on the Knowledge of Good and Evil: A Reappraisal of W.Z. Harvey

Iyyun 66 (3):258-269 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In an unsung yet excellent paper, W.Z. Harvey set out to explain how both Maimonides and Spinoza have similarly problematic views on the nature of the knowledge of good and evil. In it, he proposed an answer to solving the problem. In the many decades since, debates surrounding this topic have flourished. A recent paper by Joshua Parens, his conclusions mark a distinction between Spinoza and Maimonides that threaten to undermine Harvey’s solution to the problem. I will argue that, although Parens’ distinction forces us to revise Harvey’s contention, Harvey’s argument is still generally valid.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ELLMAS-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-11-21

Total views
83 ( #30,136 of 43,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,637 of 43,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.