What’s the Point of Efficiency? On Heath’s Market Failures Approach

Business Ethics Quarterly 32 (4):1-25 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article reviews and criticizes Joseph Heath’s market failures approach (MFA) to business ethics. Our criticism is organized into three sections. First, we argue that, even under the ideal assumptions of perfect competition, when markets generate Pareto-efficient distributions, Heath’s approach does not rule out significant harms. Second, we show that, under nonideal conditions, the MFA is either too demanding, if efficiency is to be attained, or not sufficiently demanding, if the goal of Pareto efficiency is abandoned. Finally, we argue that Heath’s appeal to regulations and specific moral requirements as a remedy for market failures is unlikely to safeguard efficiency and exposes a number of general worries regarding the moral force of the MFA. We end this article with a constructive suggestion on how to adjust the MFA to avoid these problems while preserving its contractualist and Paretian spirit.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ENDWTP
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-09-21
View other versions
Added to PP
2022-09-21

Downloads
10 (#73,439)

6 months
10 (#60,058)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?