Quantity, quality, equality: introducing a new measure of social welfare

Social Choice and Welfare 57 (3):665–701 (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay I propose a new measure of social welfare. It captures the intuitive idea that quantity, quality, and equality of individual welfare all matter for social welfare. More precisely, it satisfies six conditions: Equivalence, Dominance, Quality, Strict Monotonicity, Equality and Asymmetry. These state that i) populations equivalent in individual welfare are equal in social welfare; ii) a population that dominates another in individual welfare is better; iii) a population that has a higher average welfare than another population is better, other things being equal; iv) the addition of a well-faring individual makes a population better, whereas the addition of an ill-faring individual makes a population worse; v) a population that has a higher degree of equality than another population is better, other things being equal; and vi) individual illfare matters more for social welfare than individual welfare. By satisfying the six conditions, the measure improves on previously proposed measures, such as the utilitarian Total and Average measures, as well as different kinds of Prioritarian measures.
Keywords
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ENFQQE
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-09-15
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-09-15

Total views
15 ( #63,998 of 64,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #38,700 of 64,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.