On Peter Klein's Concept of Arbitrariness

Metaphilosophy 45 (2):192-200 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
According to Peter Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows a vicious form of arbitrariness. The present article critically discusses his concept of arbitrariness. It argues that the condition Klein takes to be necessary and sufficient for an epistemic item to be arbitrary is neither necessary nor sufficient. It also argues that Klein's concept of arbitrariness is not a concept of something that is obviously vicious. Even if Klein succeeds in establishing that foundationalism allows what he regards as arbitrariness, this does not yet mean that he confronts it with a sound objection.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ENGOPK
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-26
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-04-03

Total views
185 ( #16,508 of 40,684 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #20,742 of 40,684 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.