On Peter Klein's Concept of Arbitrariness

Metaphilosophy 45 (2):192-200 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Peter Klein, foundationalism fails because it allows a vicious form of arbitrariness. The present article critically discusses his concept of arbitrariness. It argues that the condition Klein takes to be necessary and sufficient for an epistemic item to be arbitrary is neither necessary nor sufficient. It also argues that Klein's concept of arbitrariness is not a concept of something that is obviously vicious. Even if Klein succeeds in establishing that foundationalism allows what he regards as arbitrariness, this does not yet mean that he confronts it with a sound objection.

Author's Profile

Coos Engelsma
University of Groningen

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-03

Downloads
573 (#30,118)

6 months
102 (#47,423)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?