Does legal epistemology rest on a mistake? On fetishism, two‐tier system design, and conscientious fact‐finding

David Enoch, Talia Fisher & Levi Spectre

Philosophical Issues 31 (1):85-103 (2021) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

Philosophical Issues, Volume 31, Issue 1, Page 85-103, October 2021.

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

View on PhilPapers

Author Profiles

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Open University of Israel

Archival history

Archival date: 2021-07-17
View all versions

Categories

Evidence and Proof in Law in Philosophy of Law

Fetishism in Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality

Legal Ethics in Applied Ethics

Legal Reasoning and Adjudication in Philosophy of Law

Keywords

intrinsic and non-intrinsic value knowledge fetishism system design legal theory legal Epistemology

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/phis.12203

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-17

Downloads
1,065 (#17,394)

6 months
178 (#16,778)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.

How can I increase my downloads?