Hypothetical identities: Explanatory problems for the explanatory argument

Philosophical Psychology 27 (4):571-582 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recently, several philosophers have defended an explanatory argument that supposedly provides novel empirical grounds for accepting the type identity theory of phenomenal consciousness. They claim that we are justified in believing that the type identity thesis is true because it provides the best explanation for the correlations between physical properties and phenomenal properties. In this paper, I examine the actual role identities play in science and point out crucial shortcomings in the explanatory argument. I show that the supporters of the argument have failed to show that the identity thesis provides a satisfactory explanation for the correlations between physical and phenomenal properties. Hence, the explanatory argument, as it stands, does not provide new grounds for accepting the type identity theory.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Reprint years
2014
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EROHIE
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philo-Sophical Inquiry.Wimsatt, William C.; Globus, G. G.; Maxwell, G. & Savodnik, I.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-26

Total views
147 ( #16,651 of 37,286 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #23,003 of 37,286 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.