Lewis’ Conditional Analysis of Dispositions Revisited and Revised

Acta Analytica 33 (2):241-253 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The conditional analysis of dispositions is widely rejected, mainly due to counterexamples in which dispositions are either “finkish” or “masked.” David Lewis proposed a reformed conditional analysis. This view avoids the problem of finkish dispositions, but it fails to solve the problem of masking. I will propose a reformulation of Lewis’ analysis, and I will argue that this reformulation can easily be modified so that it avoids the problem of masking. In the final section, I will address the challenge that some dispositions appear to lack any stimulus condition, and I will briefly turn to the issue of reductionism.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ESCLCA
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Motivation and Agency.Mele, Alfred R.
Finkish Dispositions.Lewis, David K.
On Linking Dispositions and Conditionals.Manley, David & Wasserman, Ryan

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-09-02

Total views
103 ( #24,884 of 41,488 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #22,132 of 41,488 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.