Great expectations—ethics, avian flu and the value of progress

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):209-213 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
A recent controversy over the US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity's recommendation to censor two publications on genetically modified H5N1 avian influenza has generated concern over the threat to scientific freedom such censorship presents. In this paper, I argue that in the case of these studies, appeals to scientific freedom are not sufficient to motivate a rejection of censorship. I then use this conclusion to draw broader concerns about the ethics of dual-use research
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
EVAGEA
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-08-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-10-31

Total views
472 ( #10,965 of 57,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #42,049 of 57,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.