The Use of Sets (and Other Extensional Entities) in the Analysis of Hylomorphically Complex Objects

Metaphysics 1 (1):97-109 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Hylomorphically complex objects are things that change their parts or matter or that might have, or have had, different parts or matter. Often ontologists analyze such objects in terms of sets (or functions, understood set-theoretically) or other extensional entities such as mereological fusions or quantities of matter. I urge two reasons for being wary of any such analyses. First, being extensional, such things as sets are ill-suited to capture the characteristic modal and temporal flexibility of hylomorphically complex objects. Secondly, sets are often appealed to because they seem to contain their members. But the idea that sets do contain their members, in the ordinary sense of containment, is a substantive metaphysical position that makes analyses that rely on that idea for their plausibility much more metaphysically committing than is generally thought.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-10-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
On Words.Hawthorne, John & Lepore, Ernest
Words.Kaplan, David

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
42 ( #30,111 of 37,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #8,966 of 37,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.