Radical Knowledge Minimalism

Logos and Episteme 14 (2):223-227 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that knowledge doesn‘t require any of truth, justification, or belief. This is so for four primary reasons. First, each of the three conditions has been subject to convincing counterexamples. In addition, the resultant account explains the value of knowledge, manifests important theoretical virtues (in particular, simplicity), and avoids commitment to skepticism.

Author Profiles

Jeremy Fantl
University of Calgary
Matthew McGrath
Washington University in St. Louis

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-11

Downloads
848 (#16,009)

6 months
186 (#14,762)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?