Ethical copula, negation, and responsibility judgments: Prior’s contribution to the philosophy of normative language

Synthese 193 (11):3441-3448 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prior’s arguments for and against seeing ‘ought’ as a copula and his considerations about normative negation are applied to the case of responsibility judgments. My thesis will be that responsibility judgments, even though often expressed by using the verb ‘to be’, are in fact normative judgments. This is shown by analyzing their negation, which parallels the behavior of ought negation.

Author's Profile

Federico L. G. Faroldi
University of Ghent

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-19

Downloads
287 (#29,412)

6 months
19 (#48,158)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?