The open-endedness objection against sophisticated dispositionalism

Perspectiva Filosófica 41 (1):49-56 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Sophisticated dispositionalism proposes a naturalist reduction of mental content by claiming that the semantic content of a mental symbol is determined by the causes of the occurrence of this symbol under ideal conditions, i.e., conditions under which only the referent of a symbol can cause its tokening. However, Paul Boghossian developed the open-endedness objection in order to show that it is not possible to specify these ideal conditions in non-semantic terms, entailing that the naturalist reduction of mental content proposed by sophisticated dispositionalism is not viable. My goal in this paper is to argue that the open-endedness objection is flawed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-07-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
120 ( #49,413 of 72,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #69,413 of 72,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.