The moral obligations of trust

Philosophical Explorations 17 (3):332-345 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Moral obligation, Darwall argues, is irreducibly second personal. So too, McMyler argues, is the reason for belief supplied by testimony and which supports trust. In this paper, I follow Darwall in arguing that the testimony is not second personal ?all the way down?. However, I go on to argue, this shows that trust is not fully second personal, which in turn shows that moral obligation is equally not second personal ?all the way down?
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-09-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge on Trust.Faulkner, Paul

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Epistemology Personalized.Benton, Matthew A.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
239 ( #17,368 of 47,332 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #22,628 of 47,332 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.