The Face‐Value Theory, Know‐that, Know‐wh and Know‐how

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For sentences such as (1), "Columbus knows that the sea is unpredictable", there is a face-value theory, according to which ‘that’-clauses are singular terms denoting propositions. Famously, Prior raised an objection to the theory, but defenders of the face-value theory such as Forbes, King, Künne, Pietroski and Stanley urged that the objection could be met by maintaining that in (1) ‘to know’ designates a complex relation along the lines of being in a state of knowledge having as content. Is the theory safe, then? The aim of this paper is to show that a new problem for the theory arises if we consider attributions of skills, knacks, propensities and abilities.
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FELTFT
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge‐How and Epistemic Luck.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan
.van Inwagen, Peter
Conceptions of Truth.Künne, Wolfgang

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-07

Total views
133 ( #22,173 of 42,343 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
108 ( #4,330 of 42,343 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.