The Face‐Value Theory, Know‐that, Know‐wh and Know‐how

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
For sentences such as (1), "Columbus knows that the sea is unpredictable", there is a face-value theory, according to which ‘that’-clauses are singular terms denoting propositions. Famously, Prior raised an objection to the theory, but defenders of the face-value theory such as Forbes, King, Künne, Pietroski and Stanley urged that the objection could be met by maintaining that in (1) ‘to know’ designates a complex relation along the lines of being in a state of knowledge having as content. Is the theory safe, then? The aim of this paper is to show that a new problem for the theory arises if we consider attributions of skills, knacks, propensities and abilities.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FELTFT
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-25
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-07

Total views
222 ( #25,432 of 2,427,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #43,950 of 2,427,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.