Was und wie hat Sokrates gewusst

Elenchos 28 (1):5-40 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The first part of the paper (p. 10-21) tries to answer the first question of the title and describes a set of seven “knowledge-claims” made by Socrates: 1. There is a distinction between right opinion and knowledge. 2. Virtue is knowledge. 3. Nobody willingly does wrong. 4. To do injustice is the greatest evil for the wrongdoer himself. 5. An even greater evil is if the wrongdoer is not punished. 6. The just person is happy; the unjust person is unhappy. 7. The pleasant is not the good. These claims seem to be the “few” (oliga) (Men. 98 b3) but “very important” (kallista) (Grg. 472 c8) things that Socrates claims to know. The second part (p. 22-39) tries to answer the second question and defends the thesis that the supposed “knowledge” of Socrates is dianoetic, but not noetic. The main new idea of this paperis the comparison of the Socratic knowledge-claims with the upper states of the mind symbolized in theDivided Line, noesis and dianoia (cf. R. 511 d7-e1). Posted
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FERWUW-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-09-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Was und wie hat Sokrates gewusst.Rafael Ferber - 2007 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 28 (1):5-39.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-02-20

Total views
35 ( #38,898 of 43,787 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #38,486 of 43,787 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.