Knowing to infinity: Full knowledge and the margin‐for‐error principle

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 110 (3):1083-1113 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let's say that I fully know that if I know that, I know that I know that, I know that I know that I know that, and so on. Let's say that I partially know that if I know that but I don't fully know that. What, if anything, do I fully know? What, if anything, do I partially know? One response in the literature is that I fully know everything that I know; partial knowledge is impossible. This response is in tension with a plausible margin‐for‐error principle on knowledge. A different response in the literature is that I don't fully know anything; everything that I know, I partially know. Recently, Goldstein (forthcoming, 2024) defended a third view, according to which I fully know some things and I partially know other things. While this seems plausible, Goldstein's account is based on denying the margin‐for‐error principle. In this paper, I show that the possibility of both full knowledge and partial knowledge is consistent with the margin‐for‐error principle. I also argue that the resulting picture of knowledge is well‐motivated.

Author's Profile

Yonathan Fiat
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-13

Downloads
46 (#107,275)

6 months
46 (#103,944)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?