In defence of a correspondence theory of truth

Abstract

I want to show that truth is an important concept, and that it can be explained. However, we must deal with what are called ‘deflationist’ concepts of truth first. Deflationism is the view that there is nothing more to be said about truth once a semantic theory for the truth-predicate (such as Tarski's) has been provided.

Author's Profile

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-05

Downloads
208 (#72,907)

6 months
107 (#44,372)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?