Neuroscience and the multiple realization of cognitive functions

Philosophy of Science 77 (3):419-456 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many empirically minded philosophers have used neuroscientific data to argue against the multiple realization of cognitive functions in existing biological organisms. I argue that neuroscientists themselves have proposed a biologically based concept of multiple realization as an alternative to interpreting empirical findings in terms of one‐to‐one structure‐function mappings. I introduce this concept and its associated research framework and also how some of the main neuroscience‐based arguments against multiple realization go wrong. *Received October 2009; revised December 2009. †To contact the author, please write to: Department of Philosophy, 260 English‐Philosophy Building, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; e‐mail: carrie‐figdor@uiowa.edu.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FIGNAT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-10-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-05-22

Total views
647 ( #5,578 of 49,102 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #13,163 of 49,102 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.