L'art désœuvré, modes d'emploi. Entre esthétique et théorie de la restauration

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In the ontology of the artwork and its regimes of existence, Gérard Genette gives but little room to the theory and practice of restoration. However, restoration is seen in relation to the identity of the work itself and to its material and pragmatic temporality and anachronism. In the wake of Nelson Goodman, it is also understood as a form of actuation and implementaion of the aesthetic experience. Starting from these premises, the present essay intends to examine the relationship between Genette’s and Daniel Arasse’s reflections on restoration and the history of art, highlighting their similarities and differences with Cesare Brandi’s theory of restoration and, therefore, pointing out their as yet undischarged debts to Sartre’s phenomenology of image.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FIMLDM
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-08-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
168 ( #20,157 of 43,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
36 ( #19,824 of 43,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.