Madhyamaka Buddhist Meta-ethics: The Justificatory Grounds of Moral Judgments

Philosophy East and West 65 (3):765-785 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In recent decades, several attempts have been made to characterize Buddhism as a systematically unified and consistent normative ethical theory. This has given rise to a growing interest in meta-ethical questions. Meta-ethics can be broadly or narrowly defined. Defined broadly, it is a domain of inquiry concerned with the nature and status of the fundamental or framing presuppositions of normative ethical theories, where this includes the cognitive and epistemic requirements of presupposed conceptions of ethical agency.1 Defined narrowly, it concerns the justificatory status of fundamental moral claims or judgments, i.e., claims or judgments of the form ‘x is good, right, virtuous’ and ‘x is bad, wrong, vicious.’..
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-11-04
Latest version: 2 (2015-09-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Buddhism and Animal Ethics.Bronwyn Finnigan - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (7):1-12.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
362 ( #9,182 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #15,987 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.