Responding to Normativity

In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 2. Clarendon Press. pp. 220--39 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I believe that normative force depends on desire. This view faces serious difficulties, however, and has yet to be vindicated. This paper sketches an Argument from Voluntary Response, attempting to establish this dependence of normativity on desire by appeal to the autonomous character of our experience of normative authority, and the voluntary character of our responses to it. I first offer an account of desiring as mentally aiming intrinsically at some end. I then argue that behaviour is only voluntary if it results from such aiming; hence all voluntary behaviour is produced by desire. Full-blooded responses to normativity, I then argue, are voluntary actions: motivation to act arises voluntarily from perception of reasons to act. This fits the desire-based model of normativity but not its rivals. However this argument concludes merely that our responses to normativity are desire-based. I end with some observations about how I think we can bridge the gap from the nature of response to normativity to the nature of normativity itself.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FINRTN
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-11-10
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Sources of Normativity.Korsgaard, Christine
The Moral Problem.Smith, Michael
Motivation and Agency.Mele, Alfred R.
The Myth of Morality.Joyce, Richard

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Unpleasantness of Pain.Sapién-Córdoba, Abraham

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
333 ( #9,448 of 41,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #33,265 of 41,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.