The Cultivation of Virtue in Buddhist Ethics

Journal of Buddhist Ethics 20:667-701 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
One question pursued in Buddhist studies concerns the classification of Buddhist ethics. Damien Keown has argued that Aristotelian virtue ethics provides a useful framework for understanding Buddhist ethics, but recently other scholars have argued that character consequentialism is more suitable for this task. Although there are similarities between the two accounts, there are also important differences. In this paper, I follow Keown in defending the aretaic interpretative model, although I do not press the analogy with Aristotelian ethics. Rather, I argue that Buddhist ethics corresponds to a more generic, act-centered virtue ethics. Buddhist moral reasoning is often strikingly consequentialist, but I argue that this does not support the consequentialist interpretation. Analyzing the concept of right action must be distinguished from providing a justification for living a moral life and from formulating a procedure for making moral decisions.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Consequentialism.Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
170 ( #24,300 of 50,121 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #14,237 of 50,121 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.