Too Much Morality

In Paul Bloomfield (ed.), Morality and Self-Interest. Oxford University Press (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper addresses the nature and relationship of morality and self-interest, arguing that what we morally ought to do almost always conflicts with what we self-interestedly ought to do. The concept of morality is analyzed as being essentially and radically other-regarding, and the category of the supererogatory is explained as consisting in what we morally ought to do but are not socially expected to do. I express skepticism about whether there is a coherent question, ‘Which ought I all things considered to obey?’ and suggest that the best substitute is a question about which is more important for me. Importance for a person, in turn, is explained as dependent upon what a person is disposed to care about. I suggest that morality and self-interest are both relatively unimportant for us when compared with our other ends
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-11-10
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
813 ( #6,300 of 2,448,362 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,057 of 2,448,362 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.