Research Ethics Insurrection: Challenges to REB Criteria from the Social Sciences

The Meeting of the Minds 1 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social Science relies heavily on the use of ethnography and other forms of qualitative study, research that may place the researcher as well as their subjects at significant ethical risk. In Canada, Research Ethics Boards are responsible for protecting research participants during these studies. But how much ethical oversight ought the Research Ethics Boards be entitled to? Are they repressing valuable qualitative studies or are the Social Science simply rebelling against new but appropriate control mechanisms not formerly applied to them? This paper evaluates how well the changes made in the TCPS 2 respond to the concerns of Social Scientists as presented in the literature.

Author's Profile

Steven J. Firth
University of Helsinki

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-13

Downloads
128 (#91,542)

6 months
62 (#89,907)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?