Doing away with the No Miracles Argument

In Dennis Dieks & Vassilios Karakostas (eds.), Recent Progress in Philosophy of Science: Perspectives and Foundational Problems. Springer (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The recent debate surrounding scientific realism has largely focused on the “no miracles” argument (NMA). Indeed, it seems that most contemporary realists and anti-realists have tied the case for realism to the adequacy of this argument. I argue that it is mistake for realists to let the debate be framed in this way. Realists would be well advised to abandon the NMA altogether and pursue an alternative strategy, which I call the “local strategy”.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FITDAW-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-09-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-09-17

Total views
904 ( #4,930 of 2,432,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,425 of 2,432,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.