Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review

BMC Psychology 7 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Background Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. Methods We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. Results 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others’ perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Conclusions Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FITIDT-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-07-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Engineering Equity: How AI Can Help Reduce the Harm of Implicit Bias.Lin, Ying-Tung; Hung, Tzu-Wei & Huang, Linus Ta-Lun

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-07-18

Total views
113 ( #31,197 of 50,141 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,623 of 50,141 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.