Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement

Neuroethics 7 (2):173-188 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Vigorous debate over the moral propriety of cognitive enhancement exists, but the views of the public have been largely absent from the discussion. To address this gap in our knowledge, four experiments were carried out with contrastive vignettes in order to obtain quantitative data on public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement. The data collected suggest that the public is sensitive to and capable of understanding the four cardinal concerns identified by neuroethicists, and tend to cautiously accept cognitive enhancement even as they recognize its potential perils. The public is biopolitically moderate, endorses both meritocratic principles and the intrinsic value of hard work, and appears to be sensitive to the salient moral issues raised in the debate. Taken together, these data suggest that public attitudes toward enhancement are sufficiently sophisticated to merit inclusion in policy deliberations, especially if we seek to align public sentiment and policy
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FITPAT-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-02-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Weirdest People in the World?Henrich, Joseph; Heine, Steven J. & Norenzayan, Ara

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Epistemology of Cognitive Enhancement.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan
Cognitive Biases Can Affect Moral Intuitions About Cognitive Enhancement.Caviola, Lucius; Mannino, Adriano; Savulescu, Julian & Faber, Nadira

View all 20 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-08-29

Total views
658 ( #4,192 of 43,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
142 ( #3,038 of 43,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.