Public Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement

Neuroethics 7 (2):173-188 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Vigorous debate over the moral propriety of cognitive enhancement exists, but the views of the public have been largely absent from the discussion. To address this gap in our knowledge, four experiments were carried out with contrastive vignettes in order to obtain quantitative data on public attitudes towards cognitive enhancement. The data collected suggest that the public is sensitive to and capable of understanding the four cardinal concerns identified by neuroethicists, and tend to cautiously accept cognitive enhancement even as they recognize its potential perils. The public is biopolitically moderate, endorses both meritocratic principles and the intrinsic value of hard work, and appears to be sensitive to the salient moral issues raised in the debate. Taken together, these data suggest that public attitudes toward enhancement are sufficiently sophisticated to merit inclusion in policy deliberations, especially if we seek to align public sentiment and policy
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FITPAT-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-02-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2013-08-29

Total views
824 ( #4,311 of 52,923 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #6,497 of 52,923 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.