Naturalizing ethics

In Kelly James Clark (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Naturalism. London, UK: pp. 16-33 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this essay we provide (1) an argument for why ethics should be naturalized, (2) an analysis of why it is not yet naturalized, (3) a defense of ethical naturalism against two fallacies—Hume’s and Moore’s—that ethical naturalism allegedly commits, and (4) a proposal that normative ethics is best conceived as part of human ecology committed to pluralistic relativism. We explain why naturalizing ethics both entails relativism and also constrains it, and why nihilism about value is not an especially worrisome for ethical naturalists. The substantive view we put forth constitutes the essence of Duke Naturalism. (NOTE: This is a slightly modified reprint of Flangan et al 2007 of the same title.)
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FLATBC
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-03-03
Latest version: 1 (2019-03-04)
View upload history
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA
The Myth of Morality.Joyce, Richard

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-03-03

Total views
77 ( #33,379 of 45,579 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #15,884 of 45,579 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.