Solving Wollheim's Dilemma: A Fix for the Institutional Definition of Art

Metaphilosophy 44 (5):640-654 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Richard Wollheim threatened George Dickie's institutional definition of art with a dilemma which entailed that the theory is either redundant or incomprehensible and useless. This article modifies the definition to avoid such criticism. First, it shows that the definition's concept of the artworld is not vague when understood as a conventional system of beliefs and practices. Then, based on Gaut's cluster theory, it provides an account of reasons artworld members have to confer the status of a candidate for appreciation. An authorised member of an artworld has a good reason to confer the status on an object if it satisfies a subset of criteria respected as sufficient within this artworld. The first horn of the dilemma is averted because explaining the reasons behind conferral cannot eliminate references to the institution, and the second loses its sharpness, as accepting partial arbitrariness of the conferral does not deprive the theory of its explanatory power
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FOKSWD
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-10-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Artworld.Danto, Arthur

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-10-07

Total views
307 ( #11,572 of 43,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #22,590 of 43,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.