Achievement and Enhancement

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):322-338 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We engage with the nature and the value of achievement through a critical examination of an argument according to which biomedical “enhancement” of our capacities is impermissible because enhancing ourselves in this way would threaten our achievements. We call this the argument against enhancement from achievement. We assess three versions of it, each admitting to a strong or a weak reading. We argue that strong readings fail, and that weak readings, while in some cases successful in showing that enhancement interferes with the nature or value of achievement, fail to establish that enhancement poses an unusual threat to achievement.

Author Profiles

Lisa Forsberg
University of Oxford
Anthony Skelton
University of Western Ontario

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-13

Downloads
623 (#26,050)

6 months
126 (#30,830)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?