Philosophy of History: A problem with some theories of Speculative philosophy of history and substantive philosophy of history

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Leslie White, Allen Johnson and Timothy Earle, and Stephen Sanderson all produced some of the more interesting theories of history, social change and cultural evolution but their theories have a common deficiency. None of them provide an ultimate explanation for social, cultural and historical change. This failure was rectified by J. S. Mill who suggested increasing human knowledge was the ultimate cause of social, cultural and historical change. However even Mill did not ask what caused the increasing human knowledge and why the knowledge had to be acquired in a particular order and how this could affect human history.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FORPOH
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-25
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-09-25

Total views
83 ( #35,840 of 49,983 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
42 ( #14,794 of 49,983 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.