Remaking responsibility: complexity and scattered causes in human agency

In Tangjia Wang (ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of Philosophy: Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow. Global Science and Technology Forum. pp. 91-101 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Contrary to intuitions that human beings are free to think and act with “buck-stopping” freedom, philosophers since Holbach and Hume have argued that universal causation makes free will nonsensical. Contemporary neuroscience has strengthened their case and begun to reveal subtle and counterintuitive mechanisms in the processes of conscious agency. Although some fear that determinism undermines moral responsibility, the opposite is true: free will, if it existed, would undermine coherent systems of justice. Moreover, deterministic views of human choice clarify the conditions in which we ought to protect people from themselves, for example when they cannot give informed consent to medical procedures. Some of the most unresolved questions in this domain are just now emerging; they include robot ethics and the responsibilities of groups. We propose a philosophical and scientific research program to apply complex systems science to these problems.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-03-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions About Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Nahmias, Eddy; Morris, Stephen; Nadelhoffer, Thomas & Turner, Jason

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
796 ( #4,217 of 50,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #11,585 of 50,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.