How Being Better Off Is Bad for You: Implications for Distribution, Relational Equality, and an Egalitarian Ethos

In Natalie Stoljar & Kristin Voigt (eds.), Autonomy and Equality: Relational Approaches. Routledge. pp. 169-194 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, Fourie identifies and systematizes the impairments associated with having privilege and evaluates their implications for theories of relational equality and distributive justice. Having certain social privileges, for example, being a man in a patriarchal society, can also be damaging; in other words, there are “impairments of privilege.” Fourie delineates six kinds of impairments—epistemic, evaluative, emotional, health-related, affiliative, and moral. She then goes on to assess the implications of the impairments of privilege for two theories in political philosophy. Relational egalitarianism, she argues, has the theoretical resources to identify and address the problems associated with these impairments, whereas distributive egalitarianism does not. Furthermore, she argues that assessing the impairments of privilege through relational egalitarianism helps to characterize a society of equals: we must address the causes of functional impairments, express respect for the worse off by not normalizing the experiences of the privileged, and minimize competitive positionality.

Author's Profile

Carina Fourie
University of Washington

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-03

Downloads
115 (#82,764)

6 months
61 (#65,244)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?