Lying, risk and accuracy

Analysis 77 (4):726-734 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Almost all philosophers agree that a necessary condition on lying is that one says what one believes to be false. But, philosophers haven’t considered the possibility that the true requirement on lying concerns, rather, one’s degree-of-belief. Liars impose a risk on their audience. The greater the liar’s confidence that what she asserts is false, the greater the risk she’ll think she’s imposing on the dupe, and, therefore, the greater her blameworthiness. From this, I arrive at a dilemma: either the belief requirement is wrong, or lying isn’t interesting. I suggest an alternative necessary condition for lying on a degree-of-belief framework.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FOXLRA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-05-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Deception (Under Uncertainty) as a Kind of Manipulation.Krstić, Vladimir & Saville, Chantelle
Testimonial Worth.Peet, Andrew

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-08-03

Total views
110 ( #24,041 of 41,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #21,165 of 41,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.