Achievements and fallacies in Hume's account of infinite divisibility

Hume Studies 20 (1):85-101 (1994)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Throughout history, almost all mathematicians, physicists and philosophers have been of the opinion that space and time are infinitely divisible. That is, it is usually believed that space and time do not consist of atoms, but that any piece of space and time of non-zero size, however small, can itself be divided into still smaller parts. This assumption is included in geometry, as in Euclid, and also in the Euclidean and non- Euclidean geometries used in modern physics. Of the few who have denied that space and time are infinitely divisible, the most notable are the ancient atomists, and Berkeley and Hume. All of these assert not only that space and time might be atomic, but that they must be. Infinite divisibility is, they say, impossible on purely conceptual grounds.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRAAAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Computational Imagery.Glasgow, Janice & Papadias, Dimitri

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perceiving Necessity.Legg, Catherine & Franklin, James
Aristotelian Realism.Franklin, James

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
122 ( #23,302 of 42,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #21,714 of 42,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.