Achievements and fallacies in Hume's account of infinite divisibility

Hume Studies 20 (1):85-101 (1994)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Throughout history, almost all mathematicians, physicists and philosophers have been of the opinion that space and time are infinitely divisible. That is, it is usually believed that space and time do not consist of atoms, but that any piece of space and time of non-zero size, however small, can itself be divided into still smaller parts. This assumption is included in geometry, as in Euclid, and also in the Euclidean and non- Euclidean geometries used in modern physics. Of the few who have denied that space and time are infinitely divisible, the most notable are the ancient atomists, and Berkeley and Hume. All of these assert not only that space and time might be atomic, but that they must be. Infinite divisibility is, they say, impossible on purely conceptual grounds.
ISBN(s)
0319-7336
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRAAAF
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
329 ( #19,592 of 2,448,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
76 ( #7,830 of 2,448,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.