Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology

Philosophia Christi 15 (2):383-399 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper we explore the idea that Pentecostalism is best supported by conjoining it to a postmodern, narrative epistemology in which everything is a text requiring interpretation. On this view, truth doesn’t consist in a set of uninterpreted facts that make the claims of Christianity true; rather, as James K. A. Smith says, truth emerges when there is a “fit” or proportionality between the Christian story and one’s affective and emotional life. We argue that Pentecostals should reject this account of truth, since it leads to either a self-refuting story-relativism or the equally problematic fallacy of story-ism: favoring one’s own story over others without legitimate reason. In either case, we contend, the gospel itself is placed at risk.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-03-15
Latest version: 3 (2020-02-28)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
390 ( #17,062 of 2,454,407 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #12,940 of 2,454,407 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.