Bacteria, sex, and systematics

Philosophy of Science 74 (1):69-95 (2007)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Philosophical discussions of species have focused on multicellular, sexual animals and have often neglected to consider unicellular organisms like bacteria. This article begins to fill this gap by considering what species concepts, if any, apply neatly to the bacterial world. First, I argue that the biological species concept cannot be applied to bacteria because of the variable rates of genetic transfer between populations, depending in part on which gene type is prioritized. Second, I present a critique of phylogenetic bacterial species, arguing that phylogenetic bacterial classification requires a questionable metaphysical commitment to the existence of essential genes. I conclude by considering how microbiologists have dealt with these biological complexities by using more pragmatic and not exclusively evolutionary accounts of species. I argue that this pragmatism is not borne of laziness but rather of the substantial conceptual problems in classifying bacteria based on any evolutionary standard.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-07-08
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Species.Kitcher, Philip

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Model Organisms Are Not Models.Levy, Arnon & Currie, Adrian
Modern Synthesis is the Light of Microbial Genomics.Booth, Austin; Mariscal, Carlos & Doolittle, W. Ford

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
296 ( #11,210 of 42,235 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #31,928 of 42,235 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.