Stove's discovery of the worst argument in the world

Philosophy 77 (4):615-624 (2002)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The winning entry in David Stove's Competition to Find the Worst Argument in the World was: “We can know things only as they are related to us/insofar as they fall under our conceptual schemes, etc., so, we cannot know things as they are in themselves.” That argument underpins many recent relativisms, including postmodernism, post-Kuhnian sociological philosophy of science, cultural relativism, sociobiological versions of ethical relativism, and so on. All such arguments have the same form as ‘We have eyes, therefore we cannot see’, and are equally invalid.
Keywords
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FRASDO
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-24
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
211 ( #28,992 of 2,448,749 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #55,695 of 2,448,749 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.