How to Learn from Theory-Dependent Evidence; or Commutativity and Holism: A Solution for Conditionalizers

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Weisberg ([2009]) provides an argument that neither conditionalization nor Jeffrey conditionalization is capable of accommodating the holist’s claim that beliefs acquired directly from experience can suffer undercutting defeat. I diagnose this failure as stemming from the fact that neither conditionalization nor Jeffrey conditionalization give any advice about how to rationally respond to theory-dependent evidence, and I propose a novel updating procedure that does tell us how to respond to evidence like this. This holistic updating rule yields conditionalization as a special case in which our evidence is entirely theory independent. 1 Introduction2 Conditionalization3 Holism and Conditionalization4 A Holistic Update5 HCondi and Dutch Books6 Commutativity and Learning about Background Theories6.1 Commutativity6.2 Learning about background theories7 In Summation
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GALHTL
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-07-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-06-09

Total views
363 ( #7,646 of 39,604 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #25,445 of 39,604 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.