Learning and Value Change

Philosophers' Imprint 19:1--22 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Accuracy-first accounts of rational learning attempt to vindicate the intuitive idea that, while rationally-formed belief need not be true, it is nevertheless likely to be true. To this end, they attempt to show that the Bayesian's rational learning norms are a consequence of the rational pursuit of accuracy. Existing accounts fall short of this goal, for they presuppose evidential norms which are not and cannot be vindicated in terms of the single-minded pursuit of accuracy. I propose an alternative account, according to which learning experiences rationalize changes in the way you value accuracy, which in turn rationalize changes in belief. I show that this account is capable of vindicating the Bayesian's rational learning norms in terms of the single-minded pursuit of accuracy, so long as accuracy is rationally valued.
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GALLAV-2
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-29
Latest version: 2 (2019-07-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
The Logic of Decision.Jeffrey, Richard C.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-05-29

Total views
70 ( #38,221 of 50,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #33,837 of 50,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.