Updating for Externalists

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The character I'll call 'the externalist' says that your evidence could fail to tell you what evidence you do or not do have. In that case, it could be rational for you to be uncertain about what your evidence is. This is a kind of uncertainty which orthodox Bayesian epistemology has difficulty modeling. If externalism is correct, then the orthodox Bayesian learning norms of conditionalization and reflection are inconsistent with each other. I will recommend that an externalist Bayesian reject conditionalzation. In its stead, I will provide a new theory of rational learning for the externalist. I'll defend this theory by arguing that its advice will be followed by anyone whose learning dispositions maximize expected accuracy. I then explore some of the theory's consequences for the rationality of epistemic akrasia, peer disagreement, undercutting defeat, and uncertain evidence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-07-12
Latest version: 8 (2019-05-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Williamson, Timothy

View all 24 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
71 ( #28,656 of 40,655 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #20,717 of 40,655 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.