Are editors of flesh and blood necessary for meeting yet another danger with AI?

Abstract

As a writer, it is hard to defend oneself from the accusation of being a robot. Even though the argument is ad hominem it perhaps is too difficult to create a “reversed” Turing test. It is suggested in this article that editors of flesh and blood still are necessary.

Author's Profile

Johan Gamper
Subrosa KB

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-07

Downloads
130 (#91,317)

6 months
64 (#88,269)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?