Does Contextualism Hinge on A Methodological Dispute?

In Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. Routledge. pp. 81-93 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this entry, we provide an overview of some of the methodological debates surrounding contextualism and consider whether they are, in effect, based on an underlying methodological dispute. We consider three modes of motivation of epistemic contextualism including i) the method of cases, ii) the appeal to linguistic analogies and iii) the appeal to conceptual analogies and functional roles. We also consider the methodological debates about contextualism arising from experimental philosophy. We conclude that i) there is no distinctive methodological doctrine or set of methodological doctrines that is centrally invoked by all epistemic contextualists and ii) the substantive dispute about the truth of contextualism very frequently, although not invariably, reflects an underlying methodological dispute.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GAODCH
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-10-05
Latest version: 2 (2017-06-22)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Elusive Knowledge.Lewis, David K.

View all 90 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-10-05

Total views
321 ( #13,995 of 50,305 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #10,538 of 50,305 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.