Acquiring the Notion of a Dependent Designation: A Response to Douglas L. Berger

Philosophy East and West 61 (2):365-367 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In a recent issue of Philosophy East and West Douglas Berger defends a new reading of Mūlamadhyamakakārikā XXIV : 18, arguing that most contemporary translators mistranslate the important term prajñaptir upādāya, misreading it as a compound indicating "dependent designation" or something of the sort, instead of taking it simply to mean "this notion, once acquired." He attributes this alleged error, pervasive in modern scholarship, to Candrakīrti, who, Berger correctly notes, argues for the interpretation he rejects.Berger's analysis, and the reading of the text he suggests is grounded on that analysis, is insightful and fascinating, and certainly generates an understanding of Nāgārjuna's enterprise that is welcome ..
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GARATN
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-07-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-04-21

Total views
500 ( #6,296 of 43,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #13,558 of 43,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.