Is God’s Benevolence Impartial?

Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):23-30 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I consider the intuitive idea that God is fair and does not play favorites. This belief appears to be held by many theists. I will call it the Principle of Impartial Benevolence (PIB) and put it as follows: As much as possible, for all persons, God equally promotes the good and equally prevents the bad. I begin with the conviction that there is a prima facie tension between PIB and the disparity of human suffering. My aim in what follows is to clarify this tension and show that it runs deep. More specifically, I will argue that PIB imposes stringent demands—including a patient-centered theodicy—on the sorts of reasons that would justify God in permitting suffering, and, that the historical disparity of suffering indicates that these demands are not met. I conclude that theists should disavow PIB or at least consider it sub judice.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-10-04
Latest version: 2 (2015-05-06)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
673 ( #5,361 of 50,114 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
63 ( #8,849 of 50,114 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.