Is God’s Benevolence Impartial?

Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):23-30 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In this paper I consider the intuitive idea that God is fair and does not play favorites. This belief appears to be held by many theists. I will call it the Principle of Impartial Benevolence (PIB) and put it as follows: As much as possible, for all persons, God equally promotes the good and equally prevents the bad. I begin with the conviction that there is a prima facie tension between PIB and the disparity of human suffering. My aim in what follows is to clarify this tension and show that it runs deep. More specifically, I will argue that PIB imposes stringent demands—including a patient-centered theodicy—on the sorts of reasons that would justify God in permitting suffering, and, that the historical disparity of suffering indicates that these demands are not met. I conclude that theists should disavow PIB or at least consider it sub judice.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-10-04
Latest version: 2 (2015-05-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
827 ( #6,751 of 65,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
69 ( #11,103 of 65,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.