Philosophical Idling and Philosophical Relativity

Ratio 28 (1):51-64 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Peter Unger has challenged philosophical objectivism, the thesis that traditional philosophical problems have definite objective answers. He argues from semantic relativity for philosophical relativity, the thesis that for certain philosophical problems, there is no objective answer. I clarify, formulate and challenge Unger's argument. According to Unger, philosophical relativism explains philosophical idling, the fact that philosophical debates appear endless, philosophical disagreements seem irresolvable, and very little substantial progress seems made towards satisfactory and definite answers to philosophical problems. I argue, however, that the reality of philosophical idling is doubtful and, ironically, undermined by philosophical relativism. I then raise problems for several steps in Unger's argument for philosophical relativity. I conclude by arguing that philosophical relativism can avoid self-defeat only by an ad hoc limitation of its scope
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2014-03-03
Latest version: 2 (2015-05-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
488 ( #11,924 of 2,438,951 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,608 of 2,438,951 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.