Two types of psychological hedonism
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:7-14 (2016)
Abstract
I develop a distinction between two types of psychological hedonism. Inferential hedonism (or “I-hedonism”) holds that each person only has ultimate desires regarding his or her own hedonic states (pleasure and pain). Reinforcement hedonism (or “R–hedonism”) holds that each person's ultimate desires, whatever their contents are, are differentially reinforced in that person’s cognitive system only by virtue of their association with hedonic states. I’ll argue that accepting R-hedonism and rejecting I-hedonism provides a conciliatory position on the traditional altruism debate, and that it coheres well with the neuroscientist Anthony Dickinson’s theory about the evolutionary function of hedonic states, the “hedonic interface theory.” Finally, I’ll defend R-hedonism from potential objections.
Keywords
Categories
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GARTTO-11
Upload history
Added to PP index
2015-12-02
Total views
2,018 ( #2,169 of 71,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
143 ( #4,230 of 71,325 )
2015-12-02
Total views
2,018 ( #2,169 of 71,325 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
143 ( #4,230 of 71,325 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.