Vagueness and Indirect Discourse

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):258-270 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary is devoted to offer a rejoinder to an argument by Schiffer against semantic accounts of vagueness (typically relying on supervaluationist techniques) based on indirect discourse. A short sketch of the argument can be found on pp. 246-48 of ‘Vagueness and Partial Belief’ ; a more elaborated presentation occurs in “TWOIs sues of Vagueness”.

Author's Profile

Manuel García-Carpintero
Universitat de Barcelona

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
417 (#55,054)

6 months
91 (#61,938)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?