Vagueness and Indirect Discourse

Philosophical Issues 10 (1):258-270 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This commentary is devoted to offer a rejoinder to an argument by Schiffer against semantic accounts of vagueness (typically relying on supervaluationist techniques) based on indirect discourse. A short sketch of the argument can be found on pp. 246-48 of ‘Vagueness and Partial Belief’ ; a more elaborated presentation occurs in “TWOIs sues of Vagueness”.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2016-04-30
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
98 ( #44,622 of 2,448,318 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #63,509 of 2,448,318 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.